![]() Could this discrepancy result from NYC public officials a 100 years ago falsifying data, and yet fail to falsify all the data which accounts for the demographically adjusted numbers being several times worse? Comparing to other, even less crowded US cities, it looks more like the demographically adjusted NYC graph, than the official total death rate for NYC: ".the City fared much better than most counterparts with a rate of 3.9 deaths per thousand residents". However, this study reports that NYC emerged with a mortality rate of about "287.17 deaths per 100,000" (less than 3/1000) in NYC, according to Faust's research as described in. If one compares other available published data on death rates/age group in NYC from just 3 months of 1918 - in no single demographic group was the rate lower than 9/1000, and mostly it was about 2-3 times that in most demographic groups for just 3 months of Spanish Flu. Shared Decision Making and Communication. ![]() ![]() Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine.Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment.Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience.Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |